Search options (Page 64 of 97)

I'm not sure what is the reason of the problem on your site, but the allocation works as expected with 'All' buttons at least on my install, and demo site as well.

I think there is some misunderstanding of the process. When you have some payment to supplier and some part of it (but not whole amount) is already allocated to invoice, when you select again the payment you have all allocated invoice displayed with 'This allocation' input filled. This is presented here to enable reallocation of the payment, however it was previously allocated.
.
Janusz

Seems to be good idea for companies with multiply locations and central purchase department.
Thank you Alvin for clear explanation. Only one question I'm not sure about: what is purpose of authorization to proceed PO?
Janusz

If you can't see the issue on our demo site, probably something went wrong during update on your box. Otherwise give me url of the page on our site where I can see it.

Janusz

Sorry, I give up. I really can't understand what happened. Anybody else can help?
Janusz

Hello Joe,
The application  interface is rather consistent, so your question appeared trivial to me (sorry again).
Currently there is no report defined for any single bank transaction, and this is not the only lacking report in FA, I'm afraid.  If there is no print link on final page after entering transaction, you can assume the report is not available (yet). Also all existing reports are available via common reporting interface, so when in doubt you can also check here to be sure.

Janusz

Purchase requisitions were not considered as core feature so far, and as far as i know it is not developed by third parties.

Janusz

No. Standard costs can change for various reasons, so it have to be editable.

If you want to block access to this feature to some users, fix role setup related to this user. Standard costs are under Banking & GL Transactions section.

Janusz

Yes, there is some inconsistence here, but fixing displayed addresses is not enough to support third party deliveries. How do you want to keep control over quantities delivered ? Currently  purchase invoice is always entered against GRNs, but items are never received into inventory in your case.

Unfortunately I cannot keep care of this bug right now, so please add the bug report to Mantis.

Janusz

Yes it can be done by FA customization. You can e.g. set the text directly in report.
Janusz

Isn't it easier to check it yourself than wait for reply on forum?
Yes, of course it  possible. There is both bank account inquiry and pdf report (Bank Statement) which list both deposits and payments. If you register cheques/cash/transfers as customer payment you will have always debtors name displayed in reports.
Janusz

Yes, I understand this is now complex processing, but I'm not sure your needs are common for some wider audience. Anyway I think we will find some satisfactory solution.
The contracts idea looks interesting enough to work on it. I think that, when implemented correctly, it would fulfill all requirements for recursive invoices without additional hassle for users not using it.

So it is how I understand the contract idea:
. There are two groups of customers: normal and contracted. The latter category can order goods at any time,  and delivery is done asap like for normal customers, but invoices are issued on some periodic base.
. Invoices for contracted customers should be issued just like the recurrent invoices are now processed, but should also involve all additional non-periodic deliveries made for the customer since previous periodic invoice was issued.
. All delivery notes for contracted customers should be hidden in 'Invoice Against Sales Delivery' selection page. Instead they should appear in recurrent invoicing page, where they can be selected for batch invoicing.

Would be this contract scheme satisfactory for you?

Janusz