Search options (Page 175 of 200)

I asked you a while ago to change the two accounts (from an earlier COA) to 11000 and 10200. You can either change it with phpMyAdmin or with a text-editor directly in the sql script. Then everything is ok. I have changed it here, so we avoid these problems when destributing the 2.1.3.

/Joe

Ah, we overlapped our answers, vishow. I guess you saw my last extension.

/Joe

Currently, when deleting locations, we check for locations in:
table stock_moves
table work_orders
table cust_branches
It seems that we have to extend the check.
You can insert the location DEF again, and then the report will work ok.

/Joe

The dimension on the customer follows all the item lines. But you could also set a dimension on the items itself (in the items form), should you prefer.
When the delivery has taken place it uses the same dimension as set on the customer. Here you can see that the purchase is also taken care of.
Please look at the delivery note in Customer Transactions. Press the GL icon and you will see that the dimension is set on the line too.

/Joe

We have a lot of technical issues implemented in 2.2 already, but still there are a great deal to do. You can follow the changes already done in the CVS CHANGELOG.txt for unstable. So we can not just stop the 2.2 in the middle of the cycle. This doesn't make sense in a development matter.
You have to rely on us, that we are doing the development in a safe way and with as less fuss as possible for our users.
If you mean, that you can contribute with improved demo COA in a week, it is ok for us to delay the 2.1.3 a week.
Regarding the demo site, we have decided a long time ago to let the demouser be an accountant, to easily see most of the features in the program.
But we could create another user to be of level Inquiries and explain on the Website which one he/she should use. I don't know what is best here.

/Joe

Yes, you can use dimensions on both sales sales and purchase lines. You can decide when invoicing how to use either default dimension on customer or select another one.
You can experiment with the Training Co. on the various options.

/Joe

Hello,
Are you sure you need to run this as UTF-8? The footprints are quite large for PDF files when using UTF-8.
On our linux demo server,  , we changed the encoding in Setup tab, Install/Update Languages., from UTF-8 to iso-8859-1, and everything went fine using this encoding. Also this is recommended. Try for yourself on the demo server. Use 'Preferences' to shift to es_AR language. Remember to set it back again. I am not sure if all understand Spanish . Of course they should.

/Joe

Ah, just a minor correction to the suggested fixed class types in 2.2. It should probably be:
1. Assets
2. Liabilities
3. Equities
4. Income
5. Cost of goods sold
6. Expenses
It is extended with Cost of goods sold. It will help analysing tools or own routines to extend the reporting. Ok?
It will be a minor manuel correction when updating existing companies, but this is a small price to pay for this new feature, right?
When we have released the next minor 2.1.3 in a couple of days, we will merge the changes in 2.1 into 2.2. Then we can continue with this work here.

/Joe

I guess we could replace the class field, balance_sheet to include a Class Type instead. It could then be:
1. Assets
2. Liabilities
3. Owners Equities
4. Income
5. Expense (or costs)
Then we can discuss which class types should be presented converted. And take away the sign converter in the class form.
I will change this in 2.2. We know, of course, that 1,2 or 3 belongs to a balance-sheet.

Thanks for your nice words.

/Joe

Hello again. Yes it is easy to fix, but it is implemented in 2.2 unstable. On the classes you can set a sign convert in 2.2. And it should be converted in liabilities and income classes (to only have 'positive' values).
In f.i. the Scandinavian countries most people are satisfied with the presentation as it is now. The reason for not implementing it in 2.1 is that an extra field in the chart_class is needed. And we cannot change the database structure inside a minor release.

The problem is to find a way around this in current release. I don't know if a class is belonging to liability or income in the classes. I only know if it belongs to a balance_sheet.
There can be different setups.

/Joe

Hi Tom,

Have you tried to do the payment in GL, Bank Payment. Here you can have an extra entry line with bank charges. Right? The same way with Bank Deposits.

/Joe