This setting works just fine, but I have noted that while DD/MM/YYYY seems fine for the user, the initial log in screen displays as MM/DD/YYYY ... it switches once you log in to the correct format - a bug maybe?
Cheers,
Tony
It's much more fun, when you can discuss your problems with others...
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
FrontAccounting forum → Posts by tonyshaus
Pages 1
This setting works just fine, but I have noted that while DD/MM/YYYY seems fine for the user, the initial log in screen displays as MM/DD/YYYY ... it switches once you log in to the correct format - a bug maybe?
Cheers,
Tony
Hi Janusz,
Thanks for the reply. I think what we will do for now is make a simple manufactured item and use a combination of stock adjustments and additional manufacturing costs to achieve what we want.
Thanks again,
Tony
Hi,
We have an service we sell that has several components to it that are volume based and may
change depending upon the job. It is important that we track the volumes of material being
used for stock purposes, but do not want to show these on the quotation/order/invoice.
So it seems to be a BOM, but as the volumes may change we can't specify these as a fixed
qty per BOM item. Only at time of quote.
For example:
ITEM DESCR QTY UNITS PRICE
SVC1 Service type 1 1 EA $50
V1 Volume item a 25 CC $0
V2 Volume item b 30 CC $0
HR Hourly rate work 1.5 HR $0
So V1 and V2 can vary and we simply calculate the overall price but do not want to show the
components ... we were thinking about a sales kit, but then would still have $0 price items on
the quote which is confusing.
Am happy to approach this another way, just am a bit stuck on how to go about it.
Cheers,
Tony
Hi!
I have searched around the alias and see the issue of mail configuration has come up a couple of times, with the advice generally being to set up via php.inc.
As a general question on this topic, is there a way to tell php to use pear::mail as its default.
I realise this is outside the scope of front accounting, but thought there may be some advice on the subject.
Cheers,
Tony
We are about to begin implementation of FA for our business and realise that we will have to adapt some of our processes to FA, whilst others we would like to customize FA to suit our business.
A good example as follows:
We use coordinated document sequences in our current system. So a complete document flow for a quote to invoice might look like:
Quote 10224
Order 60224
Workorder 900224
Delivery docket 500224
Invoice 300224
Question: is this possible to do in FA?
Cheers,
Tony
Pages 1
FrontAccounting forum → Posts by tonyshaus
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 4 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.