thank you I will try it and gives you feedback ...much appreciated really prompt response...thankyou

Hi, I want to replace Supplier with Vendor in Reports generated by FrontAccounting. Like wise Customer with Debtors.
Kindly guide me as soon as possible.
thank you.

3

(4 replies, posted in Setup)

@apmuthu
hi, i am facing same issue as data grows in my company now the FA not backing up the data please guide me how to fix this issue with in FA
thank you

joe wrote:

This has now been fixed and committed to 2.4 Repo.

You can download a copy from here:

Download.

/Joe

Thank you so much  it is working fine.

apmuthu wrote:

@joe / @itronics: Do we intend to revert to FA 2.3.x functionality for retaining the same transaction number? Why was it changed in FA 2.4.x?

@uurfi: Open a new topic for each issue.

ok got your point .. thank you

Hello @joe:
Thanks a lot it would be great help if you can add reference number column in GL inquiries. it will solve my main concern.

Yes it changes even you make any changes in bank transaction too..
So please check and if possible send us the patch or code to modify...We would highly appreciate you early action in this regard.

Kind regards.

@joe: @itronics: @apmuthu

p.s. can you advise me how add Reference number field in General Ledger Inquiry. Currently by default it is only showing;

Type    #    Date   Dimension   Person /Item  Debit  Credit   Balance   Memo

apmuthu wrote:

Hence the DB Record Number will change on such editing as the Audit Trail needs to keep track of it.

Dear apmuthu
In FA2.3 whenever u modify any transaction DB record number will not change at all and in audit trail you can trace the modification as well.
I am just asking if you can help us turning this function off. I mean when we modify it should not get new transaction number or (DB record number) since record is already there only need to correct something

itronics wrote:

Transaction number is internal database record number, which should not be used directly as reference. For this purpose transaction reference should be used, which is preserved ensuring journal edition. If you want to use simple numbers as journal references, you can use default numbering template (the one with empty prefix) for this purpose.
Janusz

Thank you for your reply. But the software itself uses transaction number as reference while showing transaction in the GL. So when we take print of bank account or Cash account we can see only transaction numbers. Reference number will not appear in GL prints. Is there any way to show reference number in the GL accounts. Please note that in FA 2.3 version when you modify any transaction it’s transaction number never changes and any modification reflects in audit trail as well.

apmuthu wrote:

If you upgraded your FA 2.3.x to FA 2.4.x, the you may be using the old document numbering system.

@joe/@itronics: Is this how it is coded?

Thankyou for your prompt reply.
FYI I have installed fresh copy directly from your link as mentioned above. I passed first journal entry so it gets automatically #1. After that immediately I modified it by changing in description only after I press process transaction it gets #2 and #1 transaction will disappear automatically.
In the previous version whenever you modify its transaction # remain intact but in 2.4 FA it gets new latest number which is not correct as in GL transaction # are appearing and when u modify or make some correction it gets new number which is very annoying and confusing at some time.
I hope I made my point more clear. kindly advise to resolve this issue.
thanks

Hi I have downloaded directly from the link FA 2.4.3+ above and tried it but still when ever I modify Journal Transaction it will automatically get new number after I press process transaction.
In the last version Journal Transaction # will remain intact even if you modify it 100 times.
Please guide me how to resolve this issue in the new version as we use this transaction number for our filing and references.
Regards,