If you need more than 50 characters, couldn't you just use the Comment field for that?

Joe

An addendum to my former post!

1. Advanced Manufacturing.
If you make several productions or adding extra costs to a Work Order, the work in progress will be visible in the balance sheet.

When the closing productions has been done the work in progress is transferred from works in progress to finished goods.

From the Release status to Production you will see the demand of BoM items in the Item Status together with other demands as sales orders.

Joe

The material is first taken when producing. The simple assembling is taken immediately from raw material. For the advanced manufacturing this happens during producing. As far as I know we don't use the work in progress. It goes from raw material directly to finished goods.

Of course the material is reserved after the release (advanced manuf.).

Joe

@alaa

I cannot reproduce any errors in rep201. Could you be more specific and detailed.

Specific trans types? Or?

Joe

@boxygen
I have just tested to rep201.php and it seems to already work.

I now recall why we got this error in rep101. We had to take care of the new options to add AR/AP lines in Journal Entry.
And we changed the rep101 and rep201 (1, 2) to fix these items, but forgot to fix rep101 regarding the Bank Payment.

I really hope that it is working in rep101 now. Did you try with your data?

/Joe

Committed

@boxygen
I am terrible sorry that I did not accept your change in the SQL sentences in rep110. It turns out that you were right in changing it.
The 3.rd SQL sentence regarding the open balance allocation, it should also be changed accordingly.
The 4.th SQL sentence seems to be ok as is.

I am attaching the corrected file, rep101.php1. Please download and rename it to rep101.php and update your reporting folder.

Please test it and tell me if this is ok. I will then commit it and change rep201.php in the same way.

Joe

You are right Guys. I will look into this.

/Joe

@apmuthu.
As I wrote, if a credit note is made after a payment has been used for allocation the credit note is taken over the allocation, leaving the original Customer Payment open for other allocations.

@boxygen
A Bank Payment will show up in the Customer Balance. No problems with that. If the Bank Payment is not allocated with an existing Customer Payment, you can see that in the rep101.

Joe

Hello again, Guys.

I have now produced the no 1-5 in the above example.
What I needed is to add a
6. Go into Allocations, because the Credit Note has taken over the former allocation and the original Payment is left with no allocation. Use this original Payment for allocating your Bank Payment to the Customer and everything is correct.

Instead of doing the no. 5 Bank Payment to pay the customer as compensation, you can make an agreement with the customer to let the Customer Payment be there waiting for allocation of a future Sales Invoice.

We don't have to change anything in the SQL sentences in rep101. Everything is ok.

@boxygen: You should NOT change anything in the REP101 SQL.

/Joe

Hello Guys.

No we are not combining Customers and Suppliers even if they are the same legal entity.

However I understand @boxygens post. It will arise if the following condition has happened:

1. Sales Invoice is sent for products.
2. Sales Invoice is paid by Customer.
3. Customer is returning Items to us for some reason and the items are ok.
4. Credit Note is sent to Customer.
5. Bank Payment is sent to Customer as Compensation for returned Items.

This no. 5 has to be taken care of in the system.

So we must fix this.
I guess we have a similar condition on the Supplier side.

Joe

Banking and General Ledger,  Closing GL Transactions.

You may need to update the Access Role for doing this.

Joe

You can close a date for further entries.
You are free to define your own periods so to speak. There are no periods in FA but many reports are on a monthly selected base. You can change if desired.

Joe

How you setup your accountancy is all about what you need in accordance with your accountant. Either cash or accrual based.

FA will follow you in these approaches. When using prepayments the accountancy is maybe a little different, but in my opinion there are no further requirements needed in FA to accomplish this.

Joe

Hello,

Oh yes, they are saved. Just press the Get button after you have selected the Fiscal Year and Account / Dimension.

/Joe

Hello,

Normally the Supplier does not use our item codes. You can set the item number in the Purchase prices. Here you can include the suppliers item number for the item. This is the reason for not showing our item code.

Joe

Will have a look later. Maybe we should address this to Janusz.

Joe

Janusz has been asked to fix.

/Joe

Sure, you can edit the PO and set the number to be the same as the received items. And it will NOT show up in the Outstanding Orders to Receive any more.

/Joe

Hello Guys.

Really the back po is of no practical use if it will never be de!ivered..

While some of the rows might have been delivered, it should be possible to zero the rest lines.

We should not void the po but just be able to zero out the unvanted deliveries, right?

Joe

Ah, now I see the problem. Of course it gives weird results using the move.stock_id value instead of move.qty smile

Will be fixed asap and committed to 2.4. repo. Thanks for observing this.

/Joe

Committed

Hello,

Strange, shouldn't IFNULL(move.stock_id, 0) give the same result as you suggest. I will investigate this.

/Joe

797

(30 replies, posted in Fixed Assets)

This has been committed to 2.4 official repo.

/Joe

798

(30 replies, posted in Fixed Assets)

Will fix it later today.

Joe

799

(13 replies, posted in Accounts Receivable)

Ok, Guys. This has been committed with zero decimals in the amounts. I think it is better not to have too much digits when you shall overview the report.

/Joe

800

(13 replies, posted in Accounts Receivable)

Hello Guys.

If it is ok with 0 decimals, I could just change the two amount places to AmountCol. Default decimals here is 0.

I think that the decimal values is maybe unneeded in the amounts here, right?

Joe