<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[FrontAccounting forum — Voiding Transaction and Reference]]></title>
		<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=925</link>
		<atom:link href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=925&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Voiding Transaction and Reference.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:24:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Voiding Transaction and Reference]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=3914#p3914</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Instead of voiding the Journal Voucher you could have edited it and kept the reference number. This could have been done in Journal Inquiry.<br />When you void a transaction, the transaction is still there with zero amounts and occupies a reference number.<br />Unfortunately it is not possible to edit Bank Deposits/Payments at the moment due to heavy complexity with customer/supplier transactions/currency etc. Voiding them will only zero out the amounts and occupy a reference number.</p><p>/Joe</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (joe)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=3914#p3914</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Voiding Transaction and Reference]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=3912#p3912</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>I have entered a JV with certain reference number and later on I made it void.<br />Then I have to reenter the JV with &quot;SAME&quot; reference as that of voided one. I was not allowed to do so? </p><p>Is there any functional reason for this behavior ? <br />In case of wrong entry of say, payment I have to void the transaction and reenter it with same reference number.</p><p>Edit functionality would have helped a lot but till the time we may need to have same reference number for voided transactions.</p><p>P.S. - As I am new to FA, excuse me I have got things wrong in operational and functional sense. <img src="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p><p>Thanks,</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (chaitanya)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=3912#p3912</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
