<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[FrontAccounting forum — Planned changes in stock_moves table structure in FA 2.5 (update)]]></title>
		<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=8924</link>
		<atom:link href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=8924&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Planned changes in stock_moves table structure in FA 2.5 (update).]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2020 06:47:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Planned changes in stock_moves table structure in FA 2.5 (update)]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=38039#p38039</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>I&#039;ve gone through this post in Dev forum, am not sure if its too late to suggest a modification to stock_move table.<br />There should be a costed_date column, to show the actual date/sysdate and time the transaction was done, which is a different value from the transaction_date column (mostly because of backdated transactions)<br />sorting transactions by this column will help anyone to know the exact movement of average cost.</p><p>Thanks for the good work you&#039;re doing.</p><p>Regards.<br />Mugao.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (mugao-em)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2020 06:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=38039#p38039</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
