<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[FrontAccounting forum — Dimension wise balance sheet items (A/C Payable and Receivables)]]></title>
		<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=8902</link>
		<atom:link href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=8902&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Dimension wise balance sheet items (A/C Payable and Receivables).]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 07:24:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dimension wise balance sheet items (A/C Payable and Receivables)]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=38228#p38228</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot @Joe</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (kamal51223050)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 07:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=38228#p38228</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dimension wise balance sheet items (A/C Payable and Receivables)]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=37972#p37972</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks @Joe..This is good news..</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (rafat)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=37972#p37972</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dimension wise balance sheet items (A/C Payable and Receivables)]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=37970#p37970</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello Guys,</p><p>This has now been implemented in 2.4.8 core and will be committed in a while.</p><p>Joe</p><p><a href="https://github.com/FrontAccountingERP/FA/commit/b2a9c105e368f6e4fdb35477665edeff13fb574b">Committed</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (joe)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 22:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=37970#p37970</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dimension wise balance sheet items (A/C Payable and Receivables)]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=37950#p37950</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>There are no db changes.&nbsp; All the code does is pass the dimension data from the ui to the underlying db functions; prior code always passed zeroes so associated dimensions on payment records was cleared.&nbsp; I do not understand why, but clearly it was intentional.</p><p>In my opinion there is no reason to lose the dimension data in the db.&nbsp; If the dimension data was not desired (why, I do not know), it should be the responsibility of the user interface code to choose whether to display it.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Braath Waate)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 11:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=37950#p37950</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dimension wise balance sheet items (A/C Payable and Receivables)]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=37949#p37949</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@rafat</p><p>You are right.&nbsp; I did add underlying support for dimension on supplier payments, but because I only use the direct supplier invoice or bank payments, it looks like I did not update the supplier payments ui.</p><p>I&#039;m on a business trip this week; next week I will look into it.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Braath Waate)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 11:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=37949#p37949</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dimension wise balance sheet items (A/C Payable and Receivables)]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=37946#p37946</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@Braath Waate</p><p>I was looking at your fork and I gave it a try. The Customer Payment Screen has the dimensions in it but the Supplier Payment is lacking the Dimensions Entry..as attached.</p><p>I am actually running your whole fork.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (rafat)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 04:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=37946#p37946</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dimension wise balance sheet items (A/C Payable and Receivables)]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=37943#p37943</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Great News..as it looks like 2.5 is a long way to go..appreciate your implementing on 2.4.8<br />Thanks</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (rafat)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 02:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=37943#p37943</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dimension wise balance sheet items (A/C Payable and Receivables)]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=37941#p37941</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, why not. Allowing the dimensions to get booking on the balance accounts. But there might be some side effect if this is not done right.</p><p>Should this option always be enabled for dimensions? At least for using the dimensions as projects it could be adequate.</p><p>I will think a little about this. I also feel it could be ok to implement. So it would be totally up to the users how to handle this.</p><p>Let us do this on the 2.5 release. Maybe we could implement it in 2.4.8. Not at all difficult. Any objections?</p><p>Joe</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (joe)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2020 21:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=37941#p37941</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dimension wise balance sheet items (A/C Payable and Receivables)]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=37940#p37940</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@joe...I agree with @apmuthu.. I see it as a very important feature.. Can it be done? Hopefully with not many implications. As I can understand dimensions its just another view of the data that is already stored in DB. I could be very wrong of course.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (rafat)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2020 17:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=37940#p37940</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dimension wise balance sheet items (A/C Payable and Receivables)]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=37937#p37937</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Going back in reverse chronological manner for nearly 5 years yields the following commits:</p><p>Add dimension to supplier payments <br />2020-02-20: https://github.com/braathwaate/frontac24/commit/2eb8f5462ef7be2ea9c0e3593e16619f8054be11</p><p>add dimension to mfg; more flexible cost types <br />2019-01-21: https://github.com/braathwaate/frontac24/commit/740a068d847e38027fd8c351bf26be15188cfb85</p><p>Add dimension to payments <br />2018-12-24: https://github.com/braathwaate/frontac24/commit/260d6e330932eb6d8f01584ce58220acda9ec2f1</p><p>Add dimension to payments; cash basis on p/l; fix dups on gl names <br />2018-02-24: https://github.com/braathwaate/frontac24/commit/6899ac7a52454f5cebce90945725056a5c9022f1</p><p>@joe: If they do not have any DB changes (or just flags alone could suffice), can we add it to the core?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (apmuthu)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2020 14:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=37937#p37937</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dimension wise balance sheet items (A/C Payable and Receivables)]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=37928#p37928</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Vanilla FA does not dimension payments and therefore the A/P and A/R accounts do not have dimension.</p><p>If you want to make the code changes to dimension payments, I suggest that you examine my <a href="https://github.com/braathwaate/frontac24">fork</a> and look at the commits that have &quot;Add dimension&quot; in the title.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Braath Waate)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 12:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=37928#p37928</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dimension wise balance sheet items (A/C Payable and Receivables)]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=37925#p37925</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I got P&amp;L items that can be split dimension wise but balance sheet items like A/C payables and A/C receivables can&#039;t be split dimensionwise.</p><p>For a supplier invoice, <br />Dr. GR/IR Clearing - There is a dimension<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Cr. A/C payable - There is no dimension</p><p>For a customer invoice:<br />Dr. A/c Receivable (Customer) - There is no dimension<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Cr. Sales - There is a dimension</p><p>The end result is, the trial balance/P&amp;L/Balance sheet can not be segregated dimensionwise. In whole trial balance, there is a balance in Sales, COGS, inventory, A/c. Payable, A/c. receivable but in dimensions TB there is no value in the receivable and payable account.&nbsp; Need help in this. We want to have dimensions for both the payable and receivable accounts.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (kamal51223050)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 11:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=37925#p37925</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
