<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[FrontAccounting forum — I Think We Can Use the FA as a simple accounting system]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=798&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2009-08-23T06:41:59Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=798</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: I Think We Can Use the FA as a simple accounting system]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=3309#p3309" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your nice words. Over the time several from the community pave promised to help with the documentations of FA. It certainly lacks some updating.<br />We try to inform the news in the sticky topics on this forum. There are many features both in the Sales and Purchase modules.<br />One way to monitor all the implementations would also be to read the CHANGELOG.txt that are included in the installation. <br />In the CHANGELOG.txt in our CVS on Sourceforge.net you will be able to see all the upcoming news for release 2.2, that are about to ship in a month or so.</p><p>The Deposit and Payments (to cusotmers/suppliers) in Banking &amp; General Ledger are mainly unrelated to specific invoices. You can do a lot more transaction lines here. It is better to use the Customer Payment in Sales and Payment to Supplier in Purchasing for handling invoices.</p><p>Have you discovered the Quick Entries? They are good too. </p><p>/Joe</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[joe]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=3</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-08-23T06:41:59Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=3309#p3309</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[I Think We Can Use the FA as a simple accounting system]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=3308#p3308" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>FA is a vry flexible accounting system, by the month after month improvements it</p><p>seems is convering a wide variety of accounting needs.</p><br /><p>I noticed that if I Stick to only the Modules : </p><p>Setup &amp; Banking &amp; General Ledger &amp; Dimensions,</p><p> I can so easely do the Accounting excercises of my company without the </p><p>need for other modules except of Difining the Customers Or Suppliers (+ the </p><p>Definition of the Inventory location = used to setup the Co.).</p><p>Is it right or I am wrong, please advise.</p><p>From other side, I am wondering why you use :</p><p>- Purchasing/Payment to Suppliers <br />- Salses/Customers </p><p>although you have the Payments &amp; Deposits Facility in the Banking &amp; General Ledger Tab,Since those 2 Actions are not related to Invoices directly ?</p><p>Also if you permit me to ask : I think the work you are doing and improving in the Sales + Purchasing Modules are robust, but it needs :<br />- Simplify its entries and logics<br />- Arrange a help screen for those two Modules, since they need to, and nobody will understand the logic sequence&nbsp; of it except of you.<br />this will help &amp; diminue the Q&amp;A related to those 2 parts.</p><p>Finally Congratulation for this system, who proved to be a simple/flexible package.</p><p>Regards,</p><br /><p>Kalido</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Kalido]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=434</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-08-22T22:56:31Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=3308#p3308</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
