<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[FrontAccounting forum — Draft and confirmed transaction]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=709&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2009-08-11T17:25:32Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=709</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Draft and confirmed transaction]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=3214#p3214" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Another point of view over the same problem: the voiding process could allow the creation of a editable copy of the transaction that is being voiding, but including a reference (non-editable) to the voided transaction. In this way, you preserve the common practice and facilitate the accountant&#039;s work.</p><p>Saludos</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[jsantand]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=39</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-08-11T17:25:32Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=3214#p3214</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Draft and confirmed transaction]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2903#p2903" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I think it was very usefully each transactions have a status: Draft or Confirmed to possibilit imput transactions before totally aproved. Until be aproved can be easly errase not void.<br />Something like bank reconciliation without return in all transactions</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[jose manuel]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=395</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-06-18T21:35:15Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2903#p2903</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
