<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[FrontAccounting forum — Isn't it Supplier Debit Note? Why do you call it Credit Note in FA?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=6288&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2016-06-01T15:34:29Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=6288</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Isn't it Supplier Debit Note? Why do you call it Credit Note in FA?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=25586#p25586" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>You can probably either hardcode it yourself or modify the string in the .po file and then compile the .mo file and use it to suit your understanding.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[apmuthu]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=364</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-06-01T15:34:29Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=25586#p25586</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Isn't it Supplier Debit Note? Why do you call it Credit Note in FA?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=25576#p25576" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your reply,apmuthu. I think you should rename it to Supplier Debit Note to make it more understandable. All of documents in our books are named from our perspective.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Shenzo]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=21138</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-05-29T16:45:03Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=25576#p25576</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Isn't it Supplier Debit Note? Why do you call it Credit Note in FA?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=25575#p25575" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Probably because it is the prerogative of the Supplier to provide us the credit note that we take cognizance of in our books.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[apmuthu]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=364</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-05-29T12:30:18Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=25575#p25575</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Isn't it Supplier Debit Note? Why do you call it Credit Note in FA?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=25573#p25573" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>When we return items to a supplier we debit (reduce) supplier balance. Shouldn&#039;t we call Supplier Credit Note &#039;Supplier Debit Note&#039; in FA?</p><p>As I understand, the science is simple, we issue credit note when we credit supplier&#039;s or customer&#039;s account in our books. The same way we issue debit note when we debit customer&#039;s or supplier&#039;s account.</p><p>For example, Bank gives you Debit Advice (document) when they debit (reduce) your account. Why do we call it Supplier Credit Note when we are actually debiting their account?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Shenzo]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=21138</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-05-28T14:55:50Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=25573#p25573</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
