<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[FrontAccounting forum — about database]]></title>
		<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=606</link>
		<atom:link href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=606&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in about database.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:16:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: about database]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2395#p2395</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Only primary keys as used as foreign keys, so if you wish you can translate any unique key which is not primary. But translated text have to be unique of course.<br />The double auto_increment clause is MySQL dump issue, you can delete one of the two if you wish.<br />Janusz</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (itronics)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2395#p2395</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: about database]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2379#p2379</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>CREATE TABLE `0_credit_status` (<br />&nbsp; `id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment,<br />&nbsp; `reason_description` char(100) NOT NULL default &#039;&#039;,<br />&nbsp; `dissallow_invoices` tinyint(1) NOT NULL default &#039;0&#039;,<br />&nbsp; `inactive` tinyint(1) NOT NULL default &#039;0&#039;,<br />&nbsp; PRIMARY KEY&nbsp; (`id`),<br />&nbsp; UNIQUE KEY `reason_description` (`reason_description`)<br />) TYPE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=5&nbsp; AUTO_INCREMENT=5 ;</p><p>for example, i want to translate the reason_description in the credit_status table.</p><p>and why in this table, there are 2 AUTO_INCREMENT?</p><p>thanks a lot</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Leo)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2379#p2379</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: about database]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2375#p2375</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><blockquote><p>what about foreign key?</p></blockquote></div><p>Which unique keys do you want to translate?<br />JAnusz</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (itronics)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2375#p2375</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: about database]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2361#p2361</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>joe wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Regarding the differences between the &#039;tax_group_items&#039; fields in en_US-demo.sql and en_US-new.sql, you are right. In en_US-demo.sql there is a field called &#039;included_in_price&#039;. This field is obsolete and will be removed in the next release.</p><p>/Joe</p></blockquote></div><p>thanks Joe</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Leo)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2361#p2361</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: about database]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2360#p2360</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>itronics wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Why not? But you should also use the same translated value in other table, if it is used as foreign key.<br />Janusz</p></blockquote></div><p>thanks Janusz </p><p>what about foreign key?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Leo)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2360#p2360</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: about database]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2351#p2351</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the differences between the &#039;tax_group_items&#039; fields in en_US-demo.sql and en_US-new.sql, you are right. In en_US-demo.sql there is a field called &#039;included_in_price&#039;. This field is obsolete and will be removed in the next release.</p><p>/Joe</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (joe)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2351#p2351</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: about database]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2348#p2348</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>hi Janusz.</p><p>i didn&#039;t see the foreign key in the sql script. where is it?&nbsp; in the en_US_new.sql just have the primary key, unique key, key, there are not foreign key constraint.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Leo)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2348#p2348</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: about database]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2347#p2347</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Why not? But you should also use the same translated value in other table, if it is used as foreign key.<br />Janusz</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (itronics)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2347#p2347</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: about database]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2346#p2346</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>another question. i have a little ideas about database. the unique key in the table can be tanslated into chinese?</p><p>thanks <br />/leo</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Leo)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2346#p2346</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: about database]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2345#p2345</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>my meaning is that the table fields are different.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Leo)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2345#p2345</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: about database]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2343#p2343</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It is because there is more demo data in the en_US-demo.sql file.</p><p>/Joe</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (joe)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2343#p2343</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[about database]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2341#p2341</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>hi.<br />why the table 0_tax_group_items in the en_US_new.sql different from in the en_US_demo.sql</p><p>/leo</p><p>thanks everyone for help.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Leo)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=2341#p2341</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
