<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[FrontAccounting forum — Sensible 2.4 Migration Plan?]]></title>
		<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=5719</link>
		<atom:link href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=5719&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Sensible 2.4 Migration Plan?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:30:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Sensible 2.4 Migration Plan?]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=23367#p23367</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Sounds great. Regular Backups with a manual computing journal of activities and comparison of the backups will help during the skilling-up phase. How do you handle wrong entries - using new contra entries or just making changes in the raw db tables?</p><p>Making the FA period just 1 month instead of a full fiscal year or a dummy accounting year shifting one month forwards each month on restoration will help simulate closing month by closing dummy year.</p><p>The devs can put out a list of new features in FA 2.4 that will help users in deciding if and when to update.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (apmuthu)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=23367#p23367</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sensible 2.4 Migration Plan?]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=23365#p23365</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Our client is using 2.3.24 now and needs the upcoming monthly close feature in 2.4.x. Below is our migration plan. Is it sensible? Any recommendations to make it better?</p><p>- financial year is 1 Jul 2014 - 30 Jun 2015<br />- client will continue to use their manual system to finish this year<br />- we&#039;re re-entering past transactions into FA, so not having a monthly close feature is not hurting us<br />- we use FA in parallel with old system for new transactions<br />- we update FA to 2.4 when available<br />- we use this time to skill-up the team on FA, do a nice yearly close, and move into the next year clean<br />- FA 2.4.x becomes official system of record for this next financial year (1 Jul 2015 - 30 Jun 2016)</p><p>Note: The entry of past transactions and parallel operation is something the client feels strongly about to give them confidence that FA can handle their workload... which looks great so far.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (genebarker)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2015 21:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=23365#p23365</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
