FrontAccounting forum — Delivery date is a day before invoice date

Re: Delivery date is a day before invoice date

null@example.com (apmuthu) — Thu, 18 Sep 2014 02:03:42 +0000

Re: Delivery date is a day before invoice date

null@example.com (ase618) — Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:10:55 +0000

Ok that makes sense but I'm quite sure it returns an error about due date is before invoice date and has to be changed before invoice can be entered.

Re: Delivery date is a day before invoice date

null@example.com (joe) — Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:41:42 +0000

Ok, if the Payment Terms is set to be of type pre payment, then the days is set internally to -1.

This will display a due date to be the document day - 1. This is ok. This way it is easy to see that the payment terms is pre payment.

Joe

Re: Delivery date is a day before invoice date

null@example.com (ase618) — Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:10:39 +0000

I didn't set any days in the payment terms. It's not even an option to set as far as I can tell. Unless I am missing something.

Re: Delivery date is a day before invoice date

null@example.com (joe) — Tue, 16 Sep 2014 04:54:12 +0000

Ok, if you have used negative days in the Payment Terms, then I can understand this behaviour.

The Payment Terms should not be less than zero.

Joe

Re: Delivery date is a day before invoice date

null@example.com (ase618) — Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:08:54 +0000

Sure. Not sure what info you need. I have a screenshot but can not figure out how to attach it. FA version 2.3.21. The payment term is called PayPal and of the type Prepayment.

Re: Delivery date is a day before invoice date

null@example.com (joe) — Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:58:30 +0000

Can we have a Little more information about this? It seems strange. I guess you mean Due Date. Have you made a Payment Terms set up wrongly?

/Joe

Delivery date is a day before invoice date

null@example.com (ase618) — Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:16:20 +0000

In direct invoice the delivery date is set a day before the invoice date and must be changed before the invoice can be entered. Has anyone else seen this?