<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[FrontAccounting forum — Aged Supplier / Aged Customers Analysis]]></title>
		<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=281</link>
		<atom:link href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=281&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Aged Supplier / Aged Customers Analysis.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Aged Supplier / Aged Customers Analysis]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=8894#p8894</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>t2webby wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>This could be just me not understanding the logic, i&#039;m not sure but an improvement in the ways it shows the current and 0-30, 31-60, 61+ could be better shown as follows:</p></blockquote></div><p> <br />I agree with t2webby, i also didn&#039;t understand the sense of result view <br />Example<br />Terms: Due 15th Of the Following Month<br />Currency &nbsp; &nbsp; RUB<br />invoice = 1800<br />paid = 2000 and has been done reconcile of 2000 to 1800, left 200<br /> ----&gt; result view<br />Current &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1-30 Days &nbsp; &nbsp; 31-60 Days &nbsp; &nbsp; Over 60 Days &nbsp; &nbsp; Total Balance<br /> 1 800,00 &nbsp; &nbsp; -2 000,00 &nbsp; &nbsp; 0,00 &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;0,00 &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; -200,00<br />Why the reconcile doesn&#039;t work? The really this invoice was paid and no liabilities during this periods. The customer is creditor. Such report distorts the data. Is anyone who solved this problem?<br />Uma</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (uma)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=8894#p8894</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Aged Supplier / Aged Customers Analysis]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=896#p896</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The algorithms for the aged analysis is:<br />for invoices the duedate is taken as a parameter and for all other items (payments and credit notes) the docdate/paydate is taken as a parameter when calculating the aging. This is the most common way of doing it.</p><p>/Joe</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (joe)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=896#p896</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Aged Supplier / Aged Customers Analysis]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=894#p894</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>This could be just me not understanding the logic, i&#039;m not sure but an improvement in the ways it shows the current and 0-30, 31-60, 61+ could be better shown as follows:</p><p>Let&#039;s say we had 300$ - 60 days overdue, $200 of an invoiced as been payed that was originally within the 0-30 days overdue stage, and there is a 100 in current &#039;non&#039; overdue invoices. The total balance would for a particular customer/supplier would be 400</p><p><strong>Instead of:</strong></p><p>Current&nbsp; &nbsp; 0-30&nbsp; &nbsp; 31-60&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;over 60&nbsp; &nbsp; balance</p><p>600&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;-200&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;300&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;0&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;400</p><p><strong>A better way to show it would be:</strong> </p><p>Current&nbsp; &nbsp; 0-30&nbsp; &nbsp; 31-60&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;over 60&nbsp; &nbsp; balance</p><p>100&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;0&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;300&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;0&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;400</p><p>* Current to me shows what receivables/payables that are not yet due, while the 0-30, 31-60, over 60 shows what is actually due to pay or received starting with 0-30 days overdue.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (t2webby)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=894#p894</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
