<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[FrontAccounting forum — Mixture of InnoDB and MyISAM type for FA MySQL tables]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2449&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2012-01-09T17:26:44Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=2449</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Mixture of InnoDB and MyISAM type for FA MySQL tables]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=11496#p11496" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>uma wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Joe,</p><p>We have several times heard of FA 2.4 release. But everything is kept in the intrigue. Please give us (community) a couple of words about new features, changes, release time e.t.c. -)</p></blockquote></div><p>Why not starting a new topic for this ?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[elax]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=6206</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-01-09T17:26:44Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=11496#p11496</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Mixture of InnoDB and MyISAM type for FA MySQL tables]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=11495#p11495" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Joe,</p><p>We have several times heard of FA 2.4 release. But everything is kept in the intrigue. Please give us (community) a couple of words about new features, changes, release time e.t.c. -)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[uma]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=5740</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-01-09T14:59:48Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=11495#p11495</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Mixture of InnoDB and MyISAM type for FA MySQL tables]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=10858#p10858" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>We would not recommend this. FrontAccounting is using transactions to handle the multi-user environment. If using myisam for the tables that should be innodb, we loose the ability to have multi-user operation.<br />I would recommend you to move to another hosting service.</p><p>/Joe</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[joe]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=3</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-11-23T00:56:29Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=10858#p10858</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Mixture of InnoDB and MyISAM type for FA MySQL tables]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=10855#p10855" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Joe</p><p>my webhosting is now disabling innodb engine. they say that is heavy on cpu and ram resources. can i convert innodb tables to myisam?</p><p>will there be any problem? since my usage of frontaccounting is not high. very few transaction per day.</p><p>thanks in advance. looking for early reply.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[prages]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=7074</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-11-22T19:31:33Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=10855#p10855</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Mixture of InnoDB and MyISAM type for FA MySQL tables]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=10449#p10449" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Joe, thanks for your info.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Apple]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=8430</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-10-12T06:51:26Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=10449#p10449</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Mixture of InnoDB and MyISAM type for FA MySQL tables]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=10446#p10446" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>We are changing to InnoDB for all tables in release 2.4 (next major)</p><p>/Joe</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[joe]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=3</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-10-12T06:22:04Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=10446#p10446</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Mixture of InnoDB and MyISAM type for FA MySQL tables]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=10445#p10445" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone please explain why FA using different types of table ie. either InnoDB or MyISAM in MySQL. Is there a need to change one type to another in term of performance?</p><p>Please advice which type shall I change from to another if there is a need and can boost performance and processing speed.</p><p>Thank you very much.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Apple]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=8430</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-10-12T05:20:11Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=10445#p10445</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
