<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[FrontAccounting forum — MyISAM tables]]></title>
		<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=2143</link>
		<atom:link href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2143&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in MyISAM tables.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:37:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: MyISAM tables]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=9412#p9412</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>This is not required to have all tables of the same type. MyISAM engine is considered slightly faster , but does not support transactions, so both types are used in FA.<br />Janusz</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (itronics)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=9412#p9412</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[MyISAM tables]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=9409#p9409</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello, the installation notes indicate that INNODB tables are required by FrontAccounting.&nbsp; After installing version 2.3.5 I notice there is a mix of MyISAM and INNODB tables in my database.&nbsp; Is this normal and Ok or should they all be INNODB tables?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (KiegKhan)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=9409#p9409</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
