<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[FrontAccounting forum — MyISAM tables]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2143&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2011-06-10T18:37:12Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=2143</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: MyISAM tables]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=9412#p9412" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>This is not required to have all tables of the same type. MyISAM engine is considered slightly faster , but does not support transactions, so both types are used in FA.<br />Janusz</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[itronics]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=89</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-06-10T18:37:12Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=9412#p9412</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[MyISAM tables]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=9409#p9409" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello, the installation notes indicate that INNODB tables are required by FrontAccounting.&nbsp; After installing version 2.3.5 I notice there is a mix of MyISAM and INNODB tables in my database.&nbsp; Is this normal and Ok or should they all be INNODB tables?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[KiegKhan]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=847</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-06-10T05:59:05Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=9409#p9409</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
