<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[FrontAccounting forum — Customer Allocations on statements]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2102&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2011-05-18T11:51:47Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=2102</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Customer Allocations on statements]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=9178#p9178" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Joe thanks very much! It is so refreshing to deal with an open source product where the developers are so responsive. <img src="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /> <img src="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /> <img src="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p><p>You guys (still) Rock!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[rodw]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=713</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-05-18T11:51:47Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=9178#p9178</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Customer Allocations on statements]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=9170#p9170" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>This has now been fixed to follow the algorithms in Aged Customer/Supplier List. As default the allocated records are not shown and calculated.</p><p>HG repository has been updated. The changes will come in release 2.3.5</p><p>/Joe</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[joe]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=3</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-05-18T07:18:40Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=9170#p9170</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Customer Allocations on statements]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=9167#p9167" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>joe wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Hello,</p><p>This has just been fixed so there is a selection on how use this for Aged customer/supplier listings. Default is now to not include allocations.</p><p>Maybe we should also include this for statements, right?</p><p>/Joe</p></blockquote></div><p>Joe, that would be great. It would be even better if the default value ensured totals were displayed Rod&#039;s way above (ie. second layout in post) as I think that would be how most people would be accustomed to seeing statements.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[rodw]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=713</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-05-18T02:16:11Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=9167#p9167</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Customer Allocations on statements]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=9163#p9163" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>This has just been fixed so there is a selection on how use this for Aged customer/supplier listings. Default is now to not include allocations.</p><p>Maybe we should also include this for statements, right?</p><p>/Joe</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[joe]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=3</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-05-17T21:33:28Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=9163#p9163</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Customer Allocations on statements]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=9162#p9162" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I think the issue is more a reporting logic error. I might try and look at the Statement Report, but I think the problem could be resolved by :<br />1. not adding allocated payments into the aging totals and;<br />2. ensuring that only outstanding invoice amounts are added in rather than the full value (Ie invoiced amount - allocation)</p><p>It would be helpful if somebody could post up the report source file name to look at.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[rodw]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=713</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-05-17T21:15:33Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=9162#p9162</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Customer Allocations on statements]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=9157#p9157" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I agree Rod, the second layout makes alot more sense to customers. Not sure if there&#039;s any additional FA processing you may need to do to get it like that though, or if it&#039;s inherent in the way FA works.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[p2409]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=267</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-05-17T15:18:37Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=9157#p9157</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Customer Allocations on statements]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=9153#p9153" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi Guys</p><p>I am not sure this is a bug according to the development team but it is very confusing to me (and my customers) <img src="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p><p>It has taken me months to actually understand this and only after browsing the backend for errors do I see what is going on.</p><p>I have a customer whose statement shows the following balances</p><p>Current (May) 920.00<br />1-30 Days (April)&nbsp; 0.00<br />31-60 Days (March)&nbsp; &nbsp;-470.00<br />Over 60 Days $1410.00<br />Total Balance 1,860.00</p><p>The only transaction in March was a payment of $470&nbsp; allocated against the Over 60 days invoices. It appears that FA shows payments separately in the Customer balances on the statement.</p><p>Whilst FA is mathematically correct, I believe that the correct statement reporting should be like every other accounting system I have used&nbsp; and report the balances like this:</p><p>Current (May) 920.00<br />1-30 Days (April)&nbsp; 0.00<br />31-60 Days (March)&nbsp; 0.00<br />Over 60 Days $940.00<br />Total Balance 1,860.00</p><p>So who is right? Me or FA?</p><p>Is it possible to report balances as per normal standards? (eg my way?) What do others think about how this should be reported?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[rodw]]></name>
				<uri>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/profile.php?id=713</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-05-17T11:48:04Z</updated>
			<id>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=9153#p9153</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
