<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[FrontAccounting forum — Problem with Transaction References not looking at prefix...]]></title>
		<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=10737</link>
		<atom:link href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=10737&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Problem with Transaction References not looking at prefix....]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 15:08:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Problem with Transaction References not looking at prefix...]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=43881#p43881</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>it appears that the Transaction References do not look at the prefix when determining uniqueness.</p><p>I have 2 Supplier Transaction References set up.&nbsp; 1 with no prefix (generic payments) and 1 with a prefix (checking account and check number as a reference)</p><p>When entering a Supplier Payment, only the reference number is check for uniqueness, preventing references with the same number but different prefixes from being accepted.</p><p>It seems that the Supplier Payment form will return the Reference List (ref_list) index but not the prefix value.</p><p>Is there an easy way to allow duplicate reference numbers with different prefixes?<br />Thanks</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (brucek@pelhamhs.org)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 15:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=43881#p43881</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
