<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[FrontAccounting forum — Can We have an Ex. for New Multi Level Types]]></title>
		<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=1028</link>
		<atom:link href="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1028&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Can We have an Ex. for New Multi Level Types.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:12:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Can We have an Ex. for New Multi Level Types]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=4509#p4509</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The good news is that you don&#039;t have to do anything at all if you are satisfied with the Chart of Accounts and Balance Sheets or Profit/Loss Statements as they are.</p><p>The old way (and the way FA works without any change):<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Parent&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Level<br />1&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Assets&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Class&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <br />1&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Short term&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; -1 Type/Group&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;1<br />5&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Current Assets&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1 Type/Group&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;2<br />1065 Bank&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;5&nbsp; Account<br />2&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Long term&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;-1&nbsp; Type/Group&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1<br />1500 Inventory&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;2&nbsp; Account&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<br />a.s.o</p><p>First there are classes. Then there are Types/Groups in 1-2 levels. And finally the Account itself.<br />In this example the 5 Current Assets is a sub-group of Type/Group 1 Short term.</p><p>The new way (With Group/Types of the same length)<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Parent&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Level<br />1&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Assets&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Class<br />1000&nbsp; &nbsp; Short term&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; -1 Type/Group&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;1<br />1001&nbsp; &nbsp; Current Assets&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1000&nbsp; Type/Group&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;2<br />1002&nbsp; &nbsp; Bank/Cash&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1001&nbsp; Type/Group&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 3<br />1003&nbsp; &nbsp; Bank&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1002&nbsp; Type/Group&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;4<br />1065&nbsp; &nbsp; Cheque Account&nbsp; &nbsp; 1003&nbsp; &nbsp;Account&nbsp; &nbsp; <br />1100&nbsp; &nbsp; Long term&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;-1&nbsp; Type/Group&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1<br />a.s.o</p><p>Here you can have 4-5 levels of types/groups. But the Types/Groups must be in sorted order inside the class.<br />This example is somewhat exaggerated. In my opinion, I am satisfied with the old way of grouping.<br />But some countries/organizations may require more than the 2 levels we can handle in the old way.<br />Therefore this new was implemented.</p><p>The Wiki has been updated with this example.</p><p>/Joe</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (joe)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=4509#p4509</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Can We have an Ex. for New Multi Level Types]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=4508#p4508</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>joe wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Please look once again. I was sure it had been updated <img src="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" />.</p><p>Look under Banking and General Ledger, Account Groups.</p><p>/Joe</p></blockquote></div><p>joe,</p><p>that&#039;s all I&#039;ve found:<br />---<br />Allow using of multi level sub-types when digits are of same length in account types</p><p>The current account types setup with sub-levels only allowed 2 levels in the current system.</p><p>By setting up the account types with same digit lenghts in id and exactly in the order you want them presented in COA and reports and with the sub-levels you want them belong to it is now possible to use at least 4 or 5 levels. Having more is not appropriate.</p><p>Condition for doing that:</p><p>Set the variable, $use_new_account_types = 1; in your config.php<br />---</p><p>It is not an example, just a (brief) description of the setting... BTW, it is more or less just the same as introduction of this setting (feature) in NEWS:<br />https://frontaccounting.com/wbt/pages/posts/release-2.2.3121.php</p><p>I believe Kalido has seen that already (as I did), but asked for an example to understand exactly what one can achieve through this setting.</p><p>Or, is the only difference that with this setting we have now a possibility to construct 4-5 levels of classes instead of only 2 (as until now)?</p><p>In this case, why this is an option at all? To be more precise, am I loosing something if I set this option to 1 altough I have (need) only 2 levels? If not, why would it be good to have it set to 0 at all?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (LUTi)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=4508#p4508</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Can We have an Ex. for New Multi Level Types]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=4505#p4505</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>believe me joe, classes/types are better interpreted by the accountants when </p><p>they are characters. I think it is widely used in europe and middle east areas.</p><p>besides it facilitate the logic of hierarchy sub levels.</p><p>For myself, I made the necessary modifications. it was not so complex. <br />I&#039;m always ready to send it to you if you find the idea interesting to include it in next versions.</p><p>Khaled</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Kalido)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=4505#p4505</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Can We have an Ex. for New Multi Level Types]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=4494#p4494</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Please look once again. I was sure it had been updated <img src="https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" />.</p><p>Look under Banking and General Ledger, Account Groups.</p><p>/Joe</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (joe)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=4494#p4494</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Can We have an Ex. for New Multi Level Types]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=4485#p4485</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I can&#039;t find an example in Wiki for this new feature... :-(</p><p>I am setting up a test company, and managed to enter a 2-level account type system (the majority of account types was 3-digit, so the same length, but still one above the other...) in 2.2.2 already (without that setting). I&#039;ve read that it should now be possible to set more than 2 levels, but am still not sure what exactly this setting does (or, does it mean only that we have more digits now, like INT instead of TINY INT or so?).</p><p>As said already (in another topic), I&#039;d also like to have an option to set id for chart types as charatcters.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (LUTi)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=4485#p4485</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Can We have an Ex. for New Multi Level Types]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=4473#p4473</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Please look into the Wiki regarding this.</p><br /><br /><p>/Joe</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (joe)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=4473#p4473</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Can We have an Ex. for New Multi Level Types]]></title>
			<link>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=4471#p4471</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello Joe,</p><p>Can you give us please a simple example of the new Group Accounts Multi Level Feature.</p><br /><p>And how we can profit from the new facility of :<br />&nbsp; &quot; GL Account Types (Groups) allows up to 10 digits&nbsp; &quot; ?</p><br /><p>From other side is it possible from your side to include an option for changing :</p><p>id (chart_types) to Character in Config.php ?</p><br /><p>Thanks</p><p>khaled</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Kalido)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://frontaccounting.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=4471#p4471</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
